Population 12th of 15
Median Income 5th of 15
Education
Economy|Trade
R&D spending
Executed by companies in 2014
R&D Spending By Sector
R&D Spending By Industry
Exports 2016
Imports: US$ 14.32 m
Trade Balance
Exports Destination of Companies Based in
Exported Products by Companies Based in
Imports Origin of Companies Based in
Imported Products by Companies Based in
Total Investment
2014
Mean Income
2015
Industry By Output (CLP)
Occupations by workers
Industry Space
Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) measures specialization level for a location in an industry or product. In case a locality has RCA greater than one at an economic activity, the referred activity has greater presence on that location with respect to an average location.
Product Space
Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) measures specialization level for a location in an industry or product. In case a locality has RCA greater than one at an economic activity, the referred activity has greater presence on that location with respect to an average location.
Unemployed people
2016 in Atacama
Employed Women with Technical Education
2016 in Atacama
Employed Men with Technical Education
2016 in Atacama
Regional Employment By Sex
Employed People By Education Level
Female Median Income
in Atacama
Male Median Income
in Atacama
Female Median Income
in Atacama
Male Median Income
in Atacama
Salaries By Occupation
Salaries By Category
R&D spending
Executed by companies in 2014
R&D Spending By Sector
R&D Spending By Industry
Exports 2016
Imports: US$ 14.32 m
Trade Balance
Exports Destination of Companies Based in
Exported Products by Companies Based in
Imports Origin of Companies Based in
Imported Products by Companies Based in
Education|Performance
Total Students
1.8% of Chile
Students in Special Education
4.4% of Atacama
Students in Rural Education
2.5% of Atacama
School By Enrollment
Average SNED Score
In 2016
Rural Schools
23.64% of Atacama
Special Education Schools
15.76% of Atacama
Average Performance By School Type
* In the case of Special Education, these establishments do not present indicators applicable for the factors effectiveness and overcoming
Efectiveness: Educational result obtained by the establishment in relation with the population served. It is measured through the SIMCE average in all learning sub-sectors. Weighting of 37% in the SNED index.
Overcoming: Differentials of educational attainment obtained over time by the educational establishment. Weighting of 28% in the SNED index.
Fairness: Degree of accessibility and permanence of the school population in the educational establishment and the integration of groups with learning difficulties. Weighting of 22% in the SNED index.
Improvement: It was considered in its measurement the classification of the establishment in the Subsidies Inspection System and compliance with the statistical processes demanded by the Ministry of Education such as Enrollment, Teaching Suitability, Performance Acts, Improvement of working conditions and proper operation of the establishment. Weighting of 2% in the SNED index.
Initiative: Capacity of the establishment to incorporate educational innovations and engage the support of external agents in their pedagogical work. Weighting of 6% in the SNED index.
Integration: Integration and participation of professors, parents and guardians in the development of the educational project of the establishment. Weighting of 5% in the SNED index.
Average SNED Score
In 2016
Rural Schools
23.64% of Atacama
Special Education Schools
15.76% of Atacama
Efectiveness vs Overcoming by School
* In the case of Special Education, these establishments do not present indicators applicable for the factors effectiveness and overcoming
Efectiveness: Educational result obtained by the establishment in relation with the population served. It is measured through the SIMCE average in all learning sub-sectors. Weighting of 37% in the SNED index.
Overcoming: Differentials of educational attainment obtained over time by the educational establishment. Weighting of 28% in the SNED index.
Fairness: Degree of accessibility and permanence of the school population in the educational establishment and the integration of groups with learning difficulties. Weighting of 22% in the SNED index.
Improvement: It was considered in its measurement the classification of the establishment in the Subsidies Inspection System and compliance with the statistical processes demanded by the Ministry of Education such as Enrollment, Teaching Suitability, Performance Acts, Improvement of working conditions and proper operation of the establishment. Weighting of 2% in the SNED index.
Initiative: Capacity of the establishment to incorporate educational innovations and engage the support of external agents in their pedagogical work. Weighting of 6% in the SNED index.
Integration: Integration and participation of professors, parents and guardians in the development of the educational project of the establishment. Weighting of 5% in the SNED index.
Students that took the PSU
In 2016 in Atacama
Average PSU
In 2016 in Atacama
Students that took the PSU
In 2016 in Atacama
Average PSU
In 2016 in Atacama
Students that took the PSU
In 2016
Average NEM
In 2016
Average PSU
In 2016
Total Students
1.8% of Chile
Students in Special Education
4.4% of Atacama
Students in Rural Education
2.5% of Atacama
School By Enrollment
Average SNED Score
In 2016
Rural Schools
23.64% of Atacama
Special Education Schools
15.76% of Atacama
Average Performance By School Type
* In the case of Special Education, these establishments do not present indicators applicable for the factors effectiveness and overcoming
Efectiveness: Educational result obtained by the establishment in relation with the population served. It is measured through the SIMCE average in all learning sub-sectors. Weighting of 37% in the SNED index.
Overcoming: Differentials of educational attainment obtained over time by the educational establishment. Weighting of 28% in the SNED index.
Fairness: Degree of accessibility and permanence of the school population in the educational establishment and the integration of groups with learning difficulties. Weighting of 22% in the SNED index.
Improvement: It was considered in its measurement the classification of the establishment in the Subsidies Inspection System and compliance with the statistical processes demanded by the Ministry of Education such as Enrollment, Teaching Suitability, Performance Acts, Improvement of working conditions and proper operation of the establishment. Weighting of 2% in the SNED index.
Initiative: Capacity of the establishment to incorporate educational innovations and engage the support of external agents in their pedagogical work. Weighting of 6% in the SNED index.
Integration: Integration and participation of professors, parents and guardians in the development of the educational project of the establishment. Weighting of 5% in the SNED index.
Housing & Environment|Security
Internet Access
in Atacama - 2016
Use small screens
to access the internet
Use unconventional internet browser
on Smart TV or Gaming Console
Devices' use in Atacama
58.8%use device
Mobile phone
32.8%use device
Laptop computer
14.3%use device
Desktop computer
9.5%use device
Tablet
1.2%use device
Videogame console
1.1%use device
Smart TV
Number of theft complaints growth
2015-2016
Number of larceny complaints
In 2016
Theft complaints share
In 2016
Complaints By Crime
Complaints Over Time
Connected to electricity network
211.7 k in Atacama
Use fire-based heating
52.4 k in Atacama
Connected to public tap water system
211.9 k in Atacama
Main services in Atacama
98.1%Less Than 8 Blocks from
Public Transport
96.5%Less Than 20 Blocks from
Educational Center
84.2%Less Than 20 Blocks from
Health Center
97.3%Less Than 20 Blocks from
Market
88.2%Less Than 20 Blocks from
ATM
91.6%Less Than 20 Blocks from
Sport Center
91.3%Less Than 20 Blocks from
Green Areas
92.2%Less Than 20 Blocks from
Community Equipment
52.5%Less Than 20 Blocks from
Pharmacy
Rural households
4.8% of Atacama
Less than 30 square meter households
4.8% of Atacama
Households with credit in state bank
8.8% of Atacama
Internet Access
in Atacama - 2016
Use small screens
to access the internet
Use unconventional internet browser
on Smart TV or Gaming Console
Devices' use in Atacama
58.8%use device
Mobile phone
32.8%use device
Laptop computer
14.3%use device
Desktop computer
9.5%use device
Tablet
1.2%use device
Videogame console
1.1%use device
Smart TV
Number of theft complaints growth
2015-2016
Number of larceny complaints
In 2016
Theft complaints share
In 2016
Complaints By Crime
Complaints Over Time
Demographics|Origins
Estimate Population Growth
2005-2020
Population Pyramid
Population Projection
Immigrant visas
granted in 2016
Female percent of visas
granted in 2016
Growth number of visas
In period 2015-2016
Migration By Educational Level
Female Average Age
in 2016
Male Average Age
in 2016
Migration By Sex
Migration By Age
Most Common Visa Activity
2,684 visas in 2016
Most Common Visa Type
2,829 visas in 2016
Migration By Activity
Migration By Visa Type
Estimate Population Growth
2005-2020
Population Pyramid
Population Projection
Immigrant visas
granted in 2016
Female percent of visas
granted in 2016
Growth number of visas
In period 2015-2016
Migration By Educational Level
Health|Healthcare
Yearly growth in deaths by Transport accidents
2010-2014
Tumors (Neoplasms) deaths
Per 100 inhabitants in 2014
Death Causes By Diseases
Death Causes Over Time
Affiliates in FONASA
79.3 % of total
Population with Health Insurance
In 2015
Growth affiliates in ISAPRES
In period 2000-2015
Access to Health Insurance*
* “When a new beneficiary joins the Public Health Insurance, the first task of FONASA is to place them in one of its 4 income segments. This classification, of scale type, allows to gather socioeconomic characterizations of the beneficiary population, and they are defined in the following way:
- A Group: Beneficiaries lacking the resources to pay contributions in health, or in conditions of indigence (non-contributors).
- B Group: Beneficiaries with incomes under CLP$270,000 per month (contributors). Workers in the public health sector.
- C Group: Beneficiaries with incomes between CLP$270,000 and CLP$394,200 per month (contributors).
- D Group: Beneficiaries with income equal or higher than CLP$394,200 per month (contributors).
However, the specific usefulness of this distribution of the beneficiary population is to specify the co-payment that they make in return for medical care granted with the coverage. Copayment is the concept to refer to a payment for services shared between the beneficiary and the insurance, where FONASA finances or subsidizes a part (percentage) of the cost of any health care, and the beneficiary contributes out of pocket the part that we do not finance / we reward.”
Dental Discharges
Per 100 inhabitants in Atacama
Specialized Healthcares
During 2014
Urgency Healthcare
in Atacama
Population with disability
In Atacama
Population with disability
In Atacama
Female percent with disability
of 46.8 k in Atacama
Disabilities by Sex
Yearly growth in deaths by Transport accidents
2010-2014
Tumors (Neoplasms) deaths
Per 100 inhabitants in 2014
Death Causes By Diseases
Death Causes Over Time
Affiliates in FONASA
79.3 % of total
Population with Health Insurance
In 2015
Growth affiliates in ISAPRES
In period 2000-2015
Access to Health Insurance*
* “When a new beneficiary joins the Public Health Insurance, the first task of FONASA is to place them in one of its 4 income segments. This classification, of scale type, allows to gather socioeconomic characterizations of the beneficiary population, and they are defined in the following way:
- A Group: Beneficiaries lacking the resources to pay contributions in health, or in conditions of indigence (non-contributors).
- B Group: Beneficiaries with incomes under CLP$270,000 per month (contributors). Workers in the public health sector.
- C Group: Beneficiaries with incomes between CLP$270,000 and CLP$394,200 per month (contributors).
- D Group: Beneficiaries with income equal or higher than CLP$394,200 per month (contributors).
However, the specific usefulness of this distribution of the beneficiary population is to specify the co-payment that they make in return for medical care granted with the coverage. Copayment is the concept to refer to a payment for services shared between the beneficiary and the insurance, where FONASA finances or subsidizes a part (percentage) of the cost of any health care, and the beneficiary contributes out of pocket the part that we do not finance / we reward.”
Civics|Elections
Change in participation
Presidential 1st - 2nd round 2017
Participation
Presidente - 2nd round - 2017
Electoral Participation
Electoral Participation
Results 1st Round 2017
Results 2nd Round 2017
Results 1st Round
Results 2nd Round
Total amount of votes
Senator Elections - 2017
Total amount of votes
Congressperson Elections - 2017
Senator Election
Congressperson Election
Names marked with a * represent elected officials in said election.
Total amount of votes
Mayor Elections - 2016
Percentage of valid votes
Mayor Elections - 2016
Mayor Election
Change in participation
Presidential 1st - 2nd round 2017
Participation
Presidente - 2nd round - 2017